The Impact of Previous Exposure to COVID-19 on the Outcome of ICSI Cycles.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the large increase in the number of reported cases and the impact of COVID-19 on public health, the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) recommended the cessation of all activities related to assisted reproduction. There are many unknowns about the long-term effects of the virus on fertility and pregnancy. We conducted this study to offer some evidence-based guidance on the relationship between COVID-19 and IVF/ICSI cycle outcomes. METHODS: This observational study included 179 patients who underwent ICSI cycles at the Albaraka Fertility Hospital, Manama, Bahrain and the Almana hospital, KSA. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 88 individuals with a history of Covid-19 and Group 2 included 91 subjects without a history of COVID-19. RESULTS: Despite the higher pregnancy (45.1% vs. 36.4%, with p=0.264) and fertilization (52% vs. 50.6% with p=0.647) rates seen in patients without a history of COVID-19, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear evidence that exposure to COVID-19 significantly affects ICSI cycle outcomes.

The bibliometric analysis of studies on intracytoplasmic sperm injection from 2002 to 2021.

Background: Infertility is estimated to occur in 1 out of every 4-7 couples. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), a type of assisted reproduction introduced in 1992, has been used across the world for almost all indications of infertility, yielding high pregnancy rates. There is a growing concern worldwide about ICSI since semen quality has declined in recent years, accompanied with the potential risks of this technology. This study aims to analyze the current status and hotspots of ICSI via a bibliometric analysis. Methods: We retrieved publications on ICSI from the Web of Science Core Collection database from 2002 to 2021. CiteSpace was used to summarize knowledge mapping of subject categories, keywords, and co-citation relationships with the strongest citation bursts. VOSviewer was used to explore co-citation and co-occurrence relationships for countries, organizations, references, authors, and keywords. Results: A total of 8271 publications were analyzed between 2002 and 2021. The major findings are as follows: the USA, China, Italy, Japan, and Belgium are the top five prolific countries. The Free University of Brussels, University of Copenhagen, University of Valencia, Ghent University, and the University of California San Francisco are the top five contributing organizations. Fertility and Sterility and Human Reproduction are the most productive and cited journals. The hotspot topics are risks of ICSI, oocyte preservation, live birth rate, infertile men, and embryo quality in the past two decades. Conclusion: This study presents a research overview of ICSI from different perspectives. These findings will contribute to a better understanding of the current status of ICSI research and provide hotspots and trends for future studies.

Male fertility: summary overview of the publications January - March 2022.

The article presents an overview of the most significant publications on the topic of male infertility. The main selection criteria were the practical significance of the article, as well as the impact factor of the journal in which it was published, according to the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). As a result, a list of 10 papers published in the first quarter (January - March) of 2022 was compiled. The review includes articles on the following issues: the role of coronavirus infection in male infertility, the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors in infertile men, the effect of assisted reproductive technologies on the reproductive health of descendants, recurrent miscarriage, the effect of antibiotic therapy on the DNA fragmentation index, the role of antisperm antibodies in male infertility, the incidence of idiopathic male infertility, the Sixth Edition WHO guidelines for the ejaculate processing, as well as the relationship of depression with male infertility.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.

Male fertility: summary overview of the publications January - March 2022.

The article presents an overview of the most significant publications on the topic of male infertility. The main selection criteria were the practical significance of the article, as well as the impact factor of the journal in which it was published, according to the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). As a result, a list of 10 papers published in the first quarter (January - March) of 2022 was compiled. The review includes articles on the following issues: the role of coronavirus infection in male infertility, the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors in infertile men, the effect of assisted reproductive technologies on the reproductive health of descendants, recurrent miscarriage, the effect of antibiotic therapy on the DNA fragmentation index, the role of antisperm antibodies in male infertility, the incidence of idiopathic male infertility, the Sixth Edition WHO guidelines for the ejaculate processing, as well as the relationship of depression with male infertility.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.

Male fertility: summary overview of the publications January - March 2022.

The article presents an overview of the most significant publications on the topic of male infertility. The main selection criteria were the practical significance of the article, as well as the impact factor of the journal in which it was published, according to the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). As a result, a list of 10 papers published in the first quarter (January - March) of 2022 was compiled. The review includes articles on the following issues: the role of coronavirus infection in male infertility, the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors in infertile men, the effect of assisted reproductive technologies on the reproductive health of descendants, recurrent miscarriage, the effect of antibiotic therapy on the DNA fragmentation index, the role of antisperm antibodies in male infertility, the incidence of idiopathic male infertility, the Sixth Edition WHO guidelines for the ejaculate processing, as well as the relationship of depression with male infertility.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.

Male fertility: a summary overview of the publications April - September 2022.

The article provides an overview of the most significant publications on male infertility. The main selection criteria were the practical relevance of the article, as well as the impact factor of the journal it was published, according to the ScImago Journal Rank (SJR). As a result, a list of 10 papers published in Q2 - Q3 (April - September) 2022 was formed. The summary overview includes articles on the following topics: role of coronavirus infection in disorders of spermatogenesis, efficacy of hormonal stimulation before surgical sperm extraction, therapy consequences of diabetes mellitus on progeny reproductive health, new methods for selecting spermatozoa in IcSI, the efficacy of antioxidants, the safety of vaccines against SARS-coV-2, the importance of genetic tests and predictive factors for micro-TESE success.Copyright © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.

Male fertility: a review of the publications July - September 2021.

The article provides an overview of the most significant publications on the topic of male infertility. The main selection criteria were considered the practical significance of the article, as well as the impact factor of the journal in which it was published according to the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). As a result, we formed a list of 10 articles published in the III quarter (July - September) of 2021. The review included articles concerning the following issues: the ability of oocytes to repair damaged DNA-chains of sperm cells, the effectiveness of ICSI in AZF-c microdeletions, the advanced paternal age, artificial intelligence in reproductive clinics, genetic causes of infertility, the effect of surgical treatment of varicocele concerning DNA fragmentation, the role of ICSI in the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in offspring, the safety of COVID-19 vaccination for spermatogenesis, as well as the novel WHO 6 manual for semen investigation.Copyright © 2021 Vestnik Urologii. All rights reserved.

Safety of COVID-19 vaccination in women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment - Clinical study and systematic review.

Background: It was suggested that vaccination in general might affect reproductive health. Safety of COVID-19 vaccination in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART) treatment is not well established. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including 536 women undergoing fresh embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI treatment in a huge IVF center in southern China to investigate the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on oocyte maturation, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. In addition, we performed a systematic review of existing studies on the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in women undergoing ART treatment. Results: In our study, 268 women received inactivated or recombinant COVID-19 vaccination and 268 controls were enrolled based on propensity score matching. We observed a decreased fertilization rate and signs for impaired oocyte maturation in vaccinated women. Besides our study, there were 15 studies analyzing the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in women undergoing ART treatment. For the mRNA vaccines, no adverse signals were reported concerning oocyte maturation, fertilization rate, blastulation rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. In women being vaccinated with an inactivated vaccine, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were not affected, whereas oocyte maturation and fertilization rate were impaired. Conclusions: Vaccination against COVID-19 in women undergoing ART treatment seems to be safe especially for women getting mRNA vaccines. The effects on oocyte maturation and fertilization rate of inactivated and recombinant COVID-19 vaccinations might be a safety signal and need further investigation and independent confirmation.

Serum SARS-COVID-19 IgG Level Effect on Oocyte and Embryo Quality in Women Underwent ICSI

Background: SARS-COVID-19 pandemic become a major health problem and impinge a large burden on health systems. SARS-CoV-2 utilize ACE2 receptors as a main port for its entry to the cells. These are widely spread in the body including ovaries. They are important for ovarian development. Therefore SARS-CoV-2 infection may have long term consequences of female's fertility and on parameters that determine ART outcomes. This study designed to display if there is a long term effect of this disease on ova and embryo qualities during ART procedures. Material(s) and Method(s): This is a cohort study enrolling 54 infertile women attending our institute for ICSI procedure. Parameters determine oocytes and embryo quality are recoded. Serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG measured and patient classified in those with negative (<1) and positive (>=1) groups. Result(s): There are no significant differences between cases with negative and positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG in parameters for oocytes and embryo quality: p value for oocytes no. 0.84, abnormal oocytes 0.25, germinal vesicles 0.46, MI 0.52, MII 0.75, number of embryo transfer 0.86, G1 embryo 0.82, maturation rate 0.79, and fertilization rate 0.61. Conclusion(s): There are no long term effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on embryo and ova quality in patient have ART procedures. Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

Does Sars-Cov-2 virus Igg in Follicular Fluid Affect Oocytes and Embryos Quality in Assisted Reproductive Techniques?

Background: This study try to shed a light on long term consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection through it IgG level in follicular fluid on oocytes and embryo quality in ICSI procedure. Material and methods: This is a cohort analytic study in comprising 54 infertile women attending our institute for ICSI procedure. Oocytes and embryo quality parameters are stated. Follicular fluid SARS-CoV-2 IgG measured and patient classified in low (0.6), medium (0.6-1) and high (>1) levels. Results: There are no significant differences between groups in maturation rate, fertilization index, number of oocytes is, number of germinal vesicles, number of M I, number of M II, and number of abnormal oocytes, grade I embryo and number of embryo transfer (p value is 0.85, 0.68, 0.99, 0.12, 0.426, 0.85, 0.77 0.77 0.88 respectively). Conclusion: This study figures out that SARS-CoV-2 infection have no long-term consequences on embryo and oocytes quality in ICSI procedure. © 2022, ResearchTrentz Academy Publishing Education Services. All rights reserved.

Risk of contamination of semen, vaginal secretions, follicular fluid and ovarian medulla with SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing ART.

STUDY QUESTION: Can severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA be detected in the reproductive tract of asymptomatic patients undergoing ART? SUMMARY ANSWER: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA is not detectable in semen, follicular fluid, vaginal secretions or residual medulla from ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedures in asymptomatic patients who undergo ART, irrespective of the results of a triage questionnaire and a nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection test. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a huge impact on the activities of fertility clinics. Although some studies reported the presence of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA in the reproductive system during or after acute COVID-19 symptomatic infections, uncertainties remain regarding the presence of viral mRNA in the reproductive material and follicular fluid of asymptomatic patients undergoing ART. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An observational cohort trial of residual material samples including semen, follicular fluid, vaginal secretions and ovarian medulla was conducted during the second pandemic wave in Brussels from September 2020 to April 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients who underwent ART (IUI, IVF/ICSI, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation) responded to a triage questionnaire at the beginning and end of the cycle and underwent nasopharyngeal swab collection for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-PCR before the procedure according to standard recommendations. For semen analysis, only the questionnaire was requested the day before the sample collection. The ART cycles of patients with positive nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection tests and/or questionnaires were cancelled except for those that could not be postponed. After providing informed consent, swabs on residual materials were collected the day of the oocyte, ovarian tissue or semen collection and were processed for RT-qPCR. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 394 samples from 291 patients were analysed. Amongst them, 20 samples were obtained from patients with a positive questionnaire but negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test and 20 others were from patients with a positive nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test. The remaining samples were collected from patients with a negative or unknown nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test and/or a negative or unknown triage questionnaire. Viral RNA for SARS-CoV-2 was undetectable in all of the samples. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Considering the cancellation policy, only a limited number of samples from patients with positive triage questionnaires or nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 tests were included in the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The study suggested that there was no risk of reproductive tract contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic patients, irrespective of the results from a triage questionnaire or nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 test. The results suggested that no additional measures to prevent staff or cross-patient contamination need to be implemented in the IVF and andrology laboratories. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the Université Libre de Bruxelles and by a grant from Ferring. A.D. and I.D. received a grant from Ferring for the study. The authors have no other conflict of interest to declare related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

State of assisted reproduction technology in the coronavirus disease 2019 era and consequences on human reproductive system.

The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created havoc on the socio-economic aspect of the world. With billions of lives being affected by this wrecking pandemic, global fertility services were also not left untouched by its impact. The possibility of sexual transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus, its impact on male and female fertility, pregnancy, its potential teratogenic effect, and handling of gametes in the clinical laboratories were major concerns among reproductive medicine specialists, which led down all the reproductive health services, including IUI, IVF/ICSI in most of the countries. Even the people did not intend to conceive during the pandemic crisis and were hesitant to avail such services. Discrete evidence regarding the pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection and its impact on the human reproductive system is not very clear. In this review article, we intend to incorporate all the evidence related to the COVID-19 infection and its impact on human reproduction available to date. It is our responsibility to provide rightful information and to keep our patients familiar with the existing lack of clear evidence. In this COVID-19 era, it is important that the fertility management be prioritized in sub-fertile couples with diminished fertility reserve and high-risk conditions, like malignancies, that may affect their long-term fertility prospects.

Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Protocol in Infertile Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objectives: To explore the appropriate controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols in infertility patients who received the in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficiency of the early follicular-phase long-acting GnRH-agonist long (EFLL) protocol (a new protocol developed by Chinese clinicians), prolonged pituitary down-regulation of EFLL protocol (Pro-EFLL), and the GnRH-ant protocol for couples meeting the study criteria between February 2020 and June 2020 who were treated by the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University during the COVID-19 pandemic, and compared the pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates per fresh transfer cycle, number of retrieved oocytes, endometrial thickness on the day of hCG injection and the number of fertilized oocytes, mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and transferable embryos among the three protocols. Results: We found that the prolonged pituitary down-regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic by utilizing a full-dose of GnRH-a administrated in infertility patients were no differences in clinical outcomes than other protocols, The prolonged pituitary down-regulation protocol and EFLL protocol were associated with a higher Endometrial thickness on the day of hCG injection (12.67 ± 2.21 vs. 12.09 ± 2.35 vs. 10.79 ± 2.38, P < 0.001), retrieved oocytes (14.49 ± 6.30 vs. 15.02 ± 7.93 vs. 10.06 ± 7.63, P < 0.001), mature oocytes (11.60 ± 5.71 vs. 11.96 ± 6.00 vs. 7.63 ± 6.50, P < 0.001), fertilized oocytes (9.14 ± 5.43 vs. 8.44 ± 5.34 vs. 5.42 ± 5.20, P < 0.001), and transferable embryos (4.87 ± 2.96 vs. 6.47 ± 5.12 vs. 3.00 ± 3.28 vs. P < 0.001) in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. Conclusion: We recommend that patients start Gn injections 33-42 days after a pituitary downregulated full dose (3.75 mg) of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during the COVID-19 pandemic, even a delay of 2-4 weeks does not affect the implantation rate. The study can provide a more detailed estimate and clinical management strategies for infertile couples during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Undetectable viral RNA in oocytes from SARS-CoV-2 positive women.

A central concern for the safe provision of ART during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the possibility of vertical transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection through gametes and preimplantation embryos. Unfortunately, data on SARS-CoV-2 viral presence in oocytes of infected individuals are not available to date. We describe the case of two women who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation and tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR on the day of oocyte collection. The viral RNA for gene N was undetectable in all the oocytes analyzed from the two women.